Positive Action in Research Funding and Careers

Rachel opened the session by explaining how the initiative built on the work of the University of Oxford’s Equity in Research Funding project, which was the product of a cross-sector working group (the Equity in Research Funding Forum). The Forum brought together research organisations and funders to focus on equity in the context of research funding, specifically seeking opportunities to work in collaboration to make a positive difference. 

Rachel then explained the background of the Positive Action Framework. Using a mixture of online and in-person meetings, the Framework was drafted iteratively, based on wide-ranging feedback. It had two major aims:

• To provide a supportive resource focussing on potential positive action interventions related to research funding, and research careers, showcasing case studies which demonstrate positive action in practice.
• To empower practitioners across the research ecosystem to advocate for positive action within research funding, and design and implement effective interventions.

Four main areas structure the Framework: the definition and legal explanation of positive action, making the case for positive action, guidance on a robust approach, and rich case studies demonstrating practical implementation. 

Picking out some key points, Rachel talked about the definition of positive action within the Equality Act 2010, and about four prompt questions which the Framework poses to help users take a robust approach. She also covered making the case for positive action, and how the Framework can help people to make nuanced counterarguments. She added that while personal backlash to beneficiaries of positive action is considered, evidence suggests it is not widespread, and the greater risk lies in perpetuating existing disadvantages by inaction. 

Rachel then turned to practical considerations around risk, including legal and financial, reputational and bureaucratic risks. ​“In the Framework you will find detailed descriptions of these risks, how they might play out, and the sorts of mitigations you might put in place to manage them,” she said. 

Finally, Rachel summed up by looking at ​‘firm foundations and sparks of inspiration’. She said that success depends on inclusive practices related to policy design, capacity building, representation, accessibility, and engagement. She also said the Framework offers a ​“shopping list” of positive action interventions ranging from structural and procedural changes to targeted funding and support activities across different scales.

“Hopefully there’s something in there that feels achievable, regardless of what scale you’re looking at … we wanted to avoid just focussing on big, expensive, flagship programmes within this guide,” she concluded.

You can access the Framework on the link below.